While a number of the most important reform movements of the late 19th and early 20th centuries grew out of efforts to combat the negative effects of industrialization, the main focus of their efforts was not the impact of the Industrial Revolution on the natural environment. Although some reformers, such as Theodore Roosevelt and Gifford Pinchot, were deeply worried about the consequences of economic development on the natural environment, the most influential, most effective reformers were primarily concerned with the impact of the rise of big business on small businesses, industrial workers, and consumers, and with corruption in government that reformers believed resulted from the economic power of large corporations.
Farmers were upset at what they regarded as arbitrary and excessive railroad rates and abuses such as rebates to big business like Standard Oil. These farmers were among the first and most outspoken advocates of reform in the late 19th century. Pressure from the Farmers’ Alliances convinced Congress to pass and President Cleveland to sign the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, a piece of legislation designed to regulate railroad rates and prohibit corrupt practices such as rebates. By 1890, these Farmers’ Alliances had entered politics in a number of Southern and Midwestern states and succeeded in pressuring Congress to pass the Sherman Antitrust Act, outlawing all “combinations in restraint of trade.” By 1892, a national People’s Party had been organized, nominating a third-party presidential candidate and electing several members of Congress. The Populist movement, a reform movement attempting to combat the negative effects of industrialization and the rise of big business, was now in full swing.
Beginning at the state level and with strong support in many urban areas, a new progressive movement reached the national level during the first years of the 20th century. Supported by President Theodore Roosevelt, progressive reformers, like the Populists, sought to strengthen railroad regulation and both enforce and further strengthen the antitrust laws. In 1902, President Roosevelt not only forced mine owners to submit to arbitration to settle a nationwide coal strike, he also asked his attorney general to file an antitrust suit against the Northern Securities Company, a large railroad holding company. After the Supreme Court upheld a lower court decision to break up the Northern Securities Company in 1904, Roosevelt went on to strengthen the Interstate Commerce Commission’s ability to regulate railroad rates by pushing the Hepburn Act through Congress in 1906. A few years later, another progressive reformer, Woodrow Wilson, succeeded to the presidency, and he managed to further strengthen the antitrust laws by pushing the Clayton Antitrust Act through Congress in 1914.
While railroad regulation and antitrust actions attracted the most attention of reformers during the period 1880–1920, some efforts were made by reformers to mitigate the effects of industrialization and commercial expansion on the natural environment. President Roosevelt used his executive authority to put thousands of acres of public lands aside for national parks, saving them from commercial exploitation. In 1908, he convened a conservation conference at the White House in an effort to further mitigate the damage that mining and manufacturing were doing to the natural environment, especially in the West. President Roosevelt also pushed for the establishment of the forest service and appointed a conservation-minded ally, Gifford Pinchot, to head that agency. Finally, even after retiring from office, Roosevelt supported Pinchot in his efforts to prevent President Taft’s secretary of the interior, Richard Ballinger, from opening additional public lands to commercial exploitation.
Thus, both the populist and progressive movements sought to combat the negative effects of industrialization and economic expansion by focusing primarily on railroad regulation and the strengthening and enforcement of antitrust legislation. Nevertheless, some progressive reformers like Theodore Roosevelt and Gifford Pinchot did pay significant attention to preventing further damage to the natural environment and helped to found the modern conservation movement.
Courtney Lowe Hybrid AP U.S. HistoryMrs. Childers 25 November 201
The Causes of Growing Opposition to Slavery
!rom 1"" to 1#52$ sl%very w%s &rowin& %nd throu&hout the United St%tes. 'hile sl%very w%s (re)erred by some$ it be&%n to *%use issues with m%ny (eo(le$ es(e*i%lly northerners. M%ny United St%tes residents slowly be&%n to o((ose sl%very. +he w%y sl%ves were mistre%ted, une-u%lly$ inhum%ne %nd s%disti*$ (%ved % w%y to the minds o) Ameri*%ns$ *%usin& o((osition to sl%very. Sl%very w%s slowin& losin& its su((ort when (eo(le be&%n to re%lie the wr%th %nd destru*tion it brou&ht on to )%milies. M%ny Ameri*%ns (er*eived sl%very%s &entle %nd subdued. +hese (ers(e*tives were *h%n&ed when Un*le +om/s C%bin w%s (ublished. n 1#52$ % boo illustr%tin& the e))e*ts o) sl%very on )%milies *%lled
Uncle Tom’s Cabin
w%s (ut out )or the world to see. +his boo *h%n&ed the minds o) )ellow Ameri*%ns by (uttin& the re%lity o) sl%very into % )%mily/s (ers(e*tive. Asshown on the (oster )rom 1#5 %dvertisin&
Uncle Tom’s Cabin,
over 2"0$000 *o(ies were sold. +his demonstr%tes the im(%*t it h%d on (rosl%very individu%ls$ reversin& their thou&hts o) sl%very. As %lso mentioned by An&elin% 3rime in her (%(er$ 4A((e%l to the Christi%n 'omen o) the South$ )%milies were bein& destroyed %nd ri((ed %(%rt when their ids %nd husb%nds were t%en %w%y %nd sold%s sl%ves. t w%s m%de *le%r to (eo(le who were (rosl%very how s*%rrin& it w%s to inno*ent )%milies to be se(%r%ted. An&elin% 3rime (ro*l%ims$ 4No lon&er to te%r husb%nds )rom their wives$ %nd *hildren )rom their (%rents, no lon&er to m%e men$ women$ %nd *hildren wor without w%&es. +his in)luen*ed (eo(le to sto( su((ortin& sl%very %nd )i&ht to end sl%very. Not only w%s sl%very su((ort de*linin& due to the re*o&nied im(%*t th%t sl%very h%d on )%mily$ it %ddition%lly de*lined be*%use o) Ameri*%n ri&hts %nd liberties. n the *%se o)
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
in 1"#6$ % de*ision u(holdin& the %bolition o) sl%very in M%ss%*husetts$ it w%s de*ided th%t sl%very went %&%inst 3od %nd He%ven. +he 3overnment s%id th%t i) He%ven tre%ted everyone e-u%l$ it w%s only ri&ht )or them to tre%t everyone e-u%l. +he de*ision st%ted e7%*tly$ 48with whi*h He%ven 9without re&%rd to *olor$ *om(le7ion$ or sh%(e o) noses:8 h%s ins(ired %ll the hum%n r%*e8 with de*l%rin& th%t %ll men %re born )ree %nd e-u%l; %nd th%t every sub<e*t is entitled to liberty.